Skip to main content

Differentiating between Vascular and Alzheimer's Dementia

Image
By

Differentiating between Vascular and Alzheimer's Dementia

There are several points that can help differentiate between these two types of dementia. Hachinski Ischemic Score is a 13-item tool based on these factors on which a score of seven or above shows vascular dementia, while a score of three or lower points towards the diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia. The presence of the items (given below) on this scale in a patient favours a diagnosis of vascular dementia.

Here, the patient had an abrupt onset after he had a fall, a stepwise progression as showed by worsening after the falls, which might have been unrecognized TIAs and the course was fluctuating, as once he even improved slightly. However, the change in his personality, as suggested by his daughter when she said "he is no more the person he used to be" goes in favour of Alzheimer's dementia.

 

  1. Abrupt onset
  2. Stepwise deterioration
  3. Fluctuating course
  4. Nocturnal confusion
  5. Relative preservation of personality
  6. Depression
  7. Somatic complaints
  8. Focal neurological signs
  9. Emotional incontinence
  10. History of hypertension
  11. History of strokes
  12. Evidence of associated atherosclerosis
  13. Focal neurological symptoms

 

It can be especially useful to know these factors, to help quickly differentiate between the two common types of dementia. However, it is important to remember, as mentioned earlier that these two types of dementia are often comorbid. Mixed dementia is the term used when ’a patient has features of both and it is not possible to clearly separate one type’. Some of these features have been found to be more specific for vascular dementia, and thus all the items do not carry the same score. For more details on the topic, please refer to some of the sources below.

 

References

Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Russell RW, Symon L. “Cerebral blood flow in dementia.” Arch Neurol. 1975;32:632-7.

Molsa PK, Paljarvi L, Rinne JO, Rinne UK, Sako E. “Validity of clinical diagnosis in dementia: a prospective clinicopathological study.”J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48:1085-90.

Comments

Post a Comment

Your Thoughts?

Popular posts from this blog

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for the Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence

By
ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence A tool for assessing eyewitness  ADVOKATE is a tool designed to assess eyewitness evidence and how much it is reliable. It requires the user to respond to several statements/questions. Forensic psychologists, police or investigative officer can do it. The mnemonic ADVOKATE stands for: A = amount of time under observation (event and act) D = distance from suspect V = visibility (night-day, lighting) O = obstruction to the view of the witness K = known or seen before when and where (suspect) A = any special reason for remembering the subject T = time-lapse (how long has it been since witness saw suspect) E = error or material discrepancy between the description given first or any subsequent accounts by a witness.  Working with suspects (college.police.uk)
Post a Comment
Read more

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80)

By
ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80) Anorexia Nervosa is characterised by significantly low body weight for the individual’s height, age and developmental stage that is not due to another health condition or to the unavailability of food. A commonly used threshold is body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2 in adults and BMI-for-age under 5th percentile in children and adolescents. Rapid weight loss (e.g. more than 20% of total body weight within 6 months) may replace the low body weight guideline as long as other diagnostic requirements are met. Children and adolescents may exhibit failure to gain weight as expected based on the individual developmental trajectory rather than weight loss. Low body weight is accompanied by a persistent pattern of behaviours to prevent restoration of normal weight, which may include behaviours aimed at reducing energy intake (restricted eating), purging behaviours (e.g. self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives), and behaviours aimed at incr
Post a Comment
Read more

ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05

By
ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is characterised by a persistent pattern (at least 6 months) of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that has a direct negative impact on academic, occupational, or social functioning. There is evidence of significant inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms prior to age 12, typically by early to mid-childhood, though some individuals may first come to clinical attention later. The degree of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity is outside the limits of normal variation expected for age and level of intellectual functioning. Inattention refers to significant difficulty in sustaining attention to tasks that do not provide a high level of stimulation or frequent rewards, distractibility and problems with organisation. Hyperactivity refers to excessive motor activity and difficulties with remaining still, most evident in structured situations that re
Post a Comment
Read more