Skip to main content

Disclaimer

While we have made every effort to ensure that the information contained on this website is accurate and up to date, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions.

Under no circumstances shall the authors be liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site. 

By using this website you show that you understand and acknowledge that no contractual or other legal relationship is created between you and the authors of this site your use of the site.

Any opinions expressed by individual contributors to the site are the personal opinions of those contributors and cannot be taken to represent the views of the MRCPsych UK. 

Links to related sites have been provided for information only. Their presence on this site does not mean that we endorse any of the information, products or views published on these sites.

All images on the site are being used for illustrative purposes only. Any person depicted in the content is a model and has no affiliation or connection with the site, its authors or any aspect of mental health.

Unless stated otherwise, content on this website is copyright protected. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ADVOKATE: A Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence

ADVOCATE: A Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence It is a tool designed to assess the eyewitness evidence that how much it is reliable. It requires the user to respond to several statements/questions. Forensic psychologist, police or investigative officer can do it. The mnemonic ADVOKATE stands for: A = amount of time under observation (event and act) D = distance from suspect V = visibility (night-day, lighting) O = obstruction to the view of the witness K = known or seen before when and where (suspect) A = any special reason for remembering the subject T = time-lapse (how long has it been since witness saw suspect) E = error or material discrepancy between the description given first or any subsequent accounts by a witness.  Working with suspects (college.police.uk)

Diagnostic test for catatonia, the lorazepam challenge test

Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of the treatment of catatonia and are also helpful as a diagnostic probe. A positive Lorazepam Challenge Test validates the diagnosis of catatonia. After we examine the patient for signs of catatonia, 1 or 2 mg of lorazepam is administered intravenously. After 5 minutes, the patient is re-examined. If there has been no change, a second dose is given, and the patient is again reassessed (46, 78). A positive response is a marked reduction (e.g., at least 50%) of catatonic signs and symptoms, as measured with a standardized rating scale. Favorable responses usually occur within 10 min (46). If lorazepam is given intramuscularly or per os, the interval for the second dose should be longer: 15′ and 30′, respectively. Many clinicians will share the experience that a “lorazepam test” not only confirms the diagnosis of catatonia but that it also makes the underlying psychopathology apparent “by permitting mute patients to speak” (79). Analogous to the lorazepa

Assessment of Fitness to Plead (Capacity to Stand Trial) Pritchard Criteria

Capacity to Stand Trial (Prichard Criteria) Introduction To stand trial, the accused should be able to describe his behaviour and whereabouts at the time of the alleged offence, understands what happens in the courtroom and understands the role of the courtroom personnel, instruct his solicitor, distinguish between various pleas and understand the range and nature of verdicts. Pritchard Criteria In the law of England and Wales, fitness to plead is the capacity of a defendant in criminal proceedings to comprehend the course of those proceedings. Its equivalent in the United States and Canada is ‘competence to stand trial.’ If the defendant raises fitness to plead, a judge will decide whether an individual fit to plead, usually following a psychiatric evaluation. To decide whether a patient is fit to plead, it is important to determine the extent to which the defendant can:  Understand the nature of the charge Understand the difference between pleading guilty and not guilty Follow the co