Skip to main content

Psychotherapy session is ending abruptly





pllz give your ideas

Read the following case scenario carefully

Khalid came to Mr. Jamil, a counselor working in a local hospital, with the presenting complaints of having anger, difficulty in maintaining relationships, feeling of being alone and lack of interest in daily activities. Khalid also reported himself to be restricting in his social activities since the death of his wife. Counselor developed a management plan for Kahlid for six sessions in which he used different behavioral and cognitive techniques. On the sixth session (the last session) with Khalid the counselor told him that today he will terminate the counseling however he can come for the follow up sessions. But Khalid told the counselor that still he does not find himself able enough to quit counseling sessions. However counselor was of the view that six sessions were more than enough to get out of his problem and now he should practice what he had learned during the course of counseling. Now answer the following questions about the above mentioned case scenario.
1. What flaws or lack of counseling skills you can identify in the current scenario and its
consequences?
2. What suggestions you can give to the counselor for dealing with the client










Comments




Waleed Ahmed The patient should be informed at the start about the number of sessions and should also be educated that he may possibly find it difficult to quit but this will be a requirement . Suddenly informing a patient at the last session, he will be unprepared






Asma Irum: termination at least 3 session k darmyan honi chahe ,,,aur phly se informed ho











Farheen Asif: Average sessions r btw 6 to 12. During sessions new problems start coming to surface in most of the cases. Keeping the intensity of those problems u decide how many sessions will this particular patient need. Also , u need to keep a check on prognosis .If u feel it's a slow prognosis, u will have to increase the no of sessions. Sticking to the no u stated in first session is .... Absurd, specially when even the pt does not feel he is ready for termination. However, if u think pt is asking for more sessions cause u have inculcated dependency in him , then u may consider termination.
















 The biggest flaw : 'counsellor thought 6 sessions r sufficient for this problem.' Take 10 ppl with same problem. All 10 of em will respond to the therapy differently in terms of pace of the prognosis. U don't fix session no keeping in view the problem ... Rather session no is determined keeping in mind the risk n resilient factors of the pt.... Cause these 2 factors play pivotal role in determining prognosis which in turn determines how many sessions will be needed.










 Iqra Munawar: its may posible that patient dont want to move away from that situation and therapist...due to fact of emotionly attachment.thats why he make refuses to leave sessions.....so therapist should creat such environment in which he can judge client's origional behaviour ,,intrst






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for the Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence A tool for assessing eyewitness  ADVOKATE is a tool designed to assess eyewitness evidence and how much it is reliable. It requires the user to respond to several statements/questions. Forensic psychologists, police or investigative officer can do it. The mnemonic ADVOKATE stands for: A = amount of time under observation (event and act) D = distance from suspect V = visibility (night-day, lighting) O = obstruction to the view of the witness K = known or seen before when and where (suspect) A = any special reason for remembering the subject T = time-lapse (how long has it been since witness saw suspect) E = error or material discrepancy between the description given first or any subsequent accounts by a witness.  Working with suspects (college.police.uk)

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80)

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80) Anorexia Nervosa is characterised by significantly low body weight for the individual’s height, age and developmental stage that is not due to another health condition or to the unavailability of food. A commonly used threshold is body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2 in adults and BMI-for-age under 5th percentile in children and adolescents. Rapid weight loss (e.g. more than 20% of total body weight within 6 months) may replace the low body weight guideline as long as other diagnostic requirements are met. Children and adolescents may exhibit failure to gain weight as expected based on the individual developmental trajectory rather than weight loss. Low body weight is accompanied by a persistent pattern of behaviours to prevent restoration of normal weight, which may include behaviours aimed at reducing energy intake (restricted eating), purging behaviours (e.g. self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives), and behaviours aimed at incr

ICD-11 Criteria for Schizophrenia (6A20 )

ICD-11 Criteria for Schizophrenia (6A20 ) Schizophrenia is characterised by disturbances in multiple mental modalities, including thinking (e.g., delusions, disorganisation in the form of thought), perception (e.g., hallucinations), self-experience (e.g., the experience that one's feelings, impulses, thoughts, or behaviour are under the control of an external force), cognition (e.g., impaired attention, verbal memory, and social cognition), volition (e.g., loss of motivation), affect (e.g., blunted emotional expression), and behaviour (e.g., behaviour that appears bizarre or purposeless, unpredictable or inappropriate emotional responses that interfere with the organisation of behaviour). Psychomotor disturbances, including catatonia, may be present. Persistent delusions, persistent hallucinations, thought disorder, and experiences of influence, passivity, or control are considered core symptoms. Symptoms must have persisted for at least one month in order for a diagnosis of schi