Skip to main content

Escape and Avoidance Conditioning: Understanding and Applying the Concepts

Escape and Avoidance Conditioning: Understanding and Applying the Concepts


Introduction

Escape and avoidance conditioning are two types of classical conditioning that are used to explain how animals and humans learn from their environment. These concepts have been studied for decades and have important applications in fields such as psychology, education, and animal training.

Escape Conditioning

Escape conditioning is a type of classical conditioning in which an organism learns to avoid or escape from an unpleasant stimulus by performing a specific behavior. In other words, escape conditioning is the process of learning to remove oneself from an aversive situation.

An example of escape conditioning can be seen in a dog that learns to jump over a fence to escape a painful shock. The dog associates the shock with the fence and learns to escape the aversive situation by jumping over the fence. As a result, the dog's behavior is shaped through reinforcement, as the escape behavior results in the termination of the shock.

Avoidance Conditioning

Avoidance conditioning is a type of classical conditioning in which an organism learns to avoid an aversive stimulus by performing a specific behavior. In other words, avoidance conditioning is the process of learning to prevent an aversive event from occurring.

An example of avoidance conditioning can be seen in a child who learns to avoid touching a hot stove by withdrawing their hand when they get close. The child associates the heat with the stove and learns to avoid the aversive stimulus by withdrawing their hand. This behavior is shaped through reinforcement, as the avoidance behavior results in the prevention of the unpleasant stimulus.

Differences between Escape and Avoidance Conditioning

While escape and avoidance conditioning have similar mechanisms, there are some key differences between the two. Escape conditioning involves removing oneself from an aversive situation, while avoidance conditioning involves preventing an aversive event from occurring.

Another difference between escape and avoidance conditioning is the role of reinforcement. In escape conditioning, reinforcement occurs after the aversive event has been terminated, while in avoidance conditioning, reinforcement occurs before the aversive event has taken place.

Applications of Escape and Avoidance Conditioning

Escape and avoidance conditioning have a wide range of applications in different fields. In psychology, these concepts are used to explain and understand anxiety disorders, phobias, and other related disorders.

In education, escape and avoidance conditioning are used to explain how students may avoid certain subjects or activities that they find unpleasant. By understanding the underlying mechanisms, educators can help students overcome their fears and engage in more challenging activities.

In animal training, escape and avoidance conditioning are used to shape and modify the behavior of animals, such as dogs and horses. Trainers use these concepts to train animals to perform specific behaviors and to avoid or escape from aversive stimuli.

Conclusion

Escape and avoidance conditioning are important concepts in classical conditioning that have been studied for decades. These concepts are used to explain how organisms learn to avoid or escape unpleasant stimuli. They have a wide range of applications in fields such as psychology, education, and animal training. By understanding and applying the principles of escape and avoidance conditioning, we can shape and modify behavior, overcome fears, and improve our overall quality of life.

References:

  1. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158-177.
  2. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
  3. Mowrer, O. H. (1939). A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent. Psychological Review, 46(5), 553-565.4



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for the Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence A tool for assessing eyewitness  ADVOKATE is a tool designed to assess eyewitness evidence and how much it is reliable. It requires the user to respond to several statements/questions. Forensic psychologists, police or investigative officer can do it. The mnemonic ADVOKATE stands for: A = amount of time under observation (event and act) D = distance from suspect V = visibility (night-day, lighting) O = obstruction to the view of the witness K = known or seen before when and where (suspect) A = any special reason for remembering the subject T = time-lapse (how long has it been since witness saw suspect) E = error or material discrepancy between the description given first or any subsequent accounts by a witness.  Working with suspects (college.police.uk)

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80)

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80) Anorexia Nervosa is characterised by significantly low body weight for the individual’s height, age and developmental stage that is not due to another health condition or to the unavailability of food. A commonly used threshold is body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2 in adults and BMI-for-age under 5th percentile in children and adolescents. Rapid weight loss (e.g. more than 20% of total body weight within 6 months) may replace the low body weight guideline as long as other diagnostic requirements are met. Children and adolescents may exhibit failure to gain weight as expected based on the individual developmental trajectory rather than weight loss. Low body weight is accompanied by a persistent pattern of behaviours to prevent restoration of normal weight, which may include behaviours aimed at reducing energy intake (restricted eating), purging behaviours (e.g. self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives), and behaviours aimed at incr...

ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05

ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is characterised by a persistent pattern (at least 6 months) of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that has a direct negative impact on academic, occupational, or social functioning. There is evidence of significant inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms prior to age 12, typically by early to mid-childhood, though some individuals may first come to clinical attention later. The degree of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity is outside the limits of normal variation expected for age and level of intellectual functioning. Inattention refers to significant difficulty in sustaining attention to tasks that do not provide a high level of stimulation or frequent rewards, distractibility and problems with organisation. Hyperactivity refers to excessive motor activity and difficulties with remaining still, most evident in structured situations that re...