Intergroup Behaviour

Introduction

Intergroup behaviour refers to how individuals or groups of people interact with and relate to one another based on their membership in different social categories such as race, ethnicity, gender, nationality, or religion. This field of study has long been of interest to social psychologists as intergroup behaviour has the potential to lead to both cooperation and conflict.

Social Identity Theory

One of the most well-known theories of intergroup behaviour is Social Identity Theory, which was first proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s. According to this theory, individuals derive a sense of self from their membership in social categories or "ingroups." Social identity theory suggests that individuals are motivated to enhance the positive image of their ingroups, leading them to act in ways that benefit their ingroups, while negatively evaluating "outgroups" that do not belong to their ingroup. This can result in intergroup conflict, prejudice, and discrimination.

Robbers Cave Experiment

The Robbers Cave Experiment conducted by Muzafer Sherif in 1954 provides a classic example of intergroup behaviour. In this experiment, Sherif brought together a group of boys at a summer camp and randomly divided them into two groups. The groups were initially unaware of each other's existence but as they became aware of each other, they quickly developed negative attitudes and engaged in conflicts. This experiment demonstrated how intergroup behavior can rapidly escalate into hostility and conflict, even without real differences between groups.

Contact Hypothesis

However, intergroup behaviour is not always negative. The Contact Hypothesis, first proposed by psychologist Gordon Allport in the 1950s, suggests that contact between individuals from different groups can lead to improved intergroup attitudes and reduced prejudice. According to this theory, close and personal contact between individuals from different groups can help to reduce stereotypes and increase understanding. Research has shown that the Contact Hypothesis is most effective when contact is positive, occurs in a supportive context, and involves equal status between the individuals involved.

Summary

In conclusion, intergroup behaviour is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that can lead to both cooperation and conflict. Social Identity Theory and the Contact Hypothesis provide two important perspectives on intergroup behaviour, while the Robbers Cave Experiment demonstrates the rapid escalation of intergroup conflict. These theories and findings have important implications for reducing prejudice and promoting intergroup harmony.

References:

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Sherif, M. (1954). The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper & Row.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for the Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence

ADVOKATE: A Mnemonic Tool for Assessment of Eyewitness Evidence A tool for assessing eyewitness ADVOKATE is a tool designed to assess eyewitness evidence and how much it is reliable. It requires the user to respond to several statements/questions. Forensic psychologists, police or investigative officer can do it. The mnemonic ADVOKATE stands for: A = amount of time under observation (event and act) D = distance from suspect V = visibility (night-day, lighting) O = obstruction to the view of the witness K = known or seen before when and where (suspect) A = any special reason for remembering the subject T = time-lapse (how long has it been since witness saw suspect) E = error or material discrepancy between the description given first or any subsequent accounts by a witness. Working with suspects (college.police.uk)

ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05

ICD-11 Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 6A05 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is characterised by a persistent pattern (at least 6 months) of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that has a direct negative impact on academic, occupational, or social functioning. There is evidence of significant inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms prior to age 12, typically by early to mid-childhood, though some individuals may first come to clinical attention later. The degree of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity is outside the limits of normal variation expected for age and level of intellectual functioning. Inattention refers to significant difficulty in sustaining attention to tasks that do not provide a high level of stimulation or frequent rewards, distractibility and problems with organisation. Hyperactivity refers to excessive motor activity and difficulties with remaining still, most evident in structured situations that re...

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80)

ICD-11 Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (6B80) Anorexia Nervosa is characterised by significantly low body weight for the individual’s height, age and developmental stage that is not due to another health condition or to the unavailability of food. A commonly used threshold is body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2 in adults and BMI-for-age under 5th percentile in children and adolescents. Rapid weight loss (e.g. more than 20% of total body weight within 6 months) may replace the low body weight guideline as long as other diagnostic requirements are met. Children and adolescents may exhibit failure to gain weight as expected based on the individual developmental trajectory rather than weight loss. Low body weight is accompanied by a persistent pattern of behaviours to prevent restoration of normal weight, which may include behaviours aimed at reducing energy intake (restricted eating), purging behaviours (e.g. self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives), and behaviours aimed at incr...

Search This Blog